On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 09:32:59AM +0100, Zhen Lei wrote:
> In context descriptor, the offset of IR0 is 8, the offset of OR0 is 10.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leiz...@huawei.com>
> ---
>  drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
> index 2a5f810..43120ad 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
> @@ -269,10 +269,10 @@
>  #define ARM64_TCR_TG0_SHIFT          14
>  #define ARM64_TCR_TG0_MASK           0x3UL
>  #define CTXDESC_CD_0_TCR_IRGN0_SHIFT 8
> -#define ARM64_TCR_IRGN0_SHIFT                24
> +#define ARM64_TCR_IRGN0_SHIFT                8
>  #define ARM64_TCR_IRGN0_MASK         0x3UL
>  #define CTXDESC_CD_0_TCR_ORGN0_SHIFT 10
> -#define ARM64_TCR_ORGN0_SHIFT                26
> +#define ARM64_TCR_ORGN0_SHIFT                10
>  #define ARM64_TCR_ORGN0_MASK         0x3UL
>  #define CTXDESC_CD_0_TCR_SH0_SHIFT   12
>  #define ARM64_TCR_SH0_SHIFT          12

I don't understand this patch.

The ARM64_* definitions correspond to the CPU architecture, whilst the
CTXDESC_* definitions correspond to the SMMUv3 CD description.

What problem are you seeing?

Will
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

Reply via email to