Hi Alex,

Thanks for having a look.

On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 05:41:51PM +0000, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-01-16 at 16:58 +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
> > Some IOMMU drivers (e.g. the ARM SMMU) require not only the IOMMU group
> > for a PCI device, but also the effective alias of the device (as seen by
> > the IOMMU) in order to program the translations correctly.
> > 
> > This patch extends iommu_group_get_for_pci_dev to return the DMA alias
> > of the device as well as the group, which can potentially be overridden
> > by quirks in the PCI layer. The function is also made visible to drivers
> > so that the new functionality can be used.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.dea...@arm.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
> >  include/linux/iommu.h |  2 ++
> >  2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> This would seem to promote the idea that an IOMMU group for a PCI device
> has a single bdf alias, which is not necessarily true.

True, but you can deal with that in the caller by ensuring you get the alias
for each member of the group, no?

> It also only returns the alias based on PCI topology, which can easily be
> discovered by the caller using pci_for_each_dma_alias() directly.  So I
> don't really see the benefit of this versus using
> iommu_group_for_each_dev() and/or pci_for_each_dma_alias().

The problem with using pci_for_each_dma_alias is that I end up duplicating
the remainder of iommu_group_get_for_pci_dev in the SMMU driver in order
to handle PCI_DEV_FLAGS_DMA_ALIAS_DEVFN set by PCI quirks and
aliasing due to ACS constraints. Furthermore, I end up walking the PCI
topology twice: once for the group and a second time for the aliases.

> It's also intentional that while we have PCI specific code in iommu.c,
> the exposed interfaces are device agnostic.  I'm not seeing enough
> reason here to change that.  Thanks,

Hmm, I'd really rather have *something* in the core to avoid duplication
between all IOMMU drivers sitting on PCI without ACPI tables to describe
the IDs. How about a method to extract the IDs from an IOMMU group?

Will

> 
> Alex
> 
> > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> > index f7718d73e984..5300b6507481 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> > @@ -616,6 +616,7 @@ static struct iommu_group *get_pci_alias_group(struct 
> > pci_dev *pdev,
> >  struct group_for_pci_data {
> >     struct pci_dev *pdev;
> >     struct iommu_group *group;
> > +   u16 alias;
> >  };
> >  
> >  /*
> > @@ -628,6 +629,7 @@ static int get_pci_alias_or_group(struct pci_dev *pdev, 
> > u16 alias, void *opaque)
> >  
> >     data->pdev = pdev;
> >     data->group = iommu_group_get(&pdev->dev);
> > +   data->alias = alias;
> >  
> >     return data->group != NULL;
> >  }
> > @@ -636,7 +638,8 @@ static int get_pci_alias_or_group(struct pci_dev *pdev, 
> > u16 alias, void *opaque)
> >   * Use standard PCI bus topology, isolation features, and DMA alias quirks
> >   * to find or create an IOMMU group for a device.
> >   */
> > -static struct iommu_group *iommu_group_get_for_pci_dev(struct pci_dev 
> > *pdev)
> > +struct iommu_group *iommu_group_get_for_pci_dev(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> > +                                           u16 *alias)
> >  {
> >     struct group_for_pci_data data;
> >     struct pci_bus *bus;
> > @@ -653,6 +656,13 @@ static struct iommu_group 
> > *iommu_group_get_for_pci_dev(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> >             return data.group;
> >  
> >     pdev = data.pdev;
> > +   if (alias) {
> > +           u8 busn = PCI_BUS_NUM(pdev->bus->number);
> > +           if (pdev->dev_flags & PCI_DEV_FLAGS_DMA_ALIAS_DEVFN)
> > +                   *alias = PCI_DEVID(busn, pdev->dma_alias_devfn);
> > +           else
> > +                   *alias = data.alias;
> > +   }
> >  
> >     /*
> >      * Continue upstream from the point of minimum IOMMU granularity
> > @@ -717,7 +727,7 @@ struct iommu_group *iommu_group_get_for_dev(struct 
> > device *dev)
> >     if (!dev_is_pci(dev))
> >             return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> >  
> > -   group = iommu_group_get_for_pci_dev(to_pci_dev(dev));
> > +   group = iommu_group_get_for_pci_dev(to_pci_dev(dev), NULL);
> >  
> >     if (IS_ERR(group))
> >             return group;
> > diff --git a/include/linux/iommu.h b/include/linux/iommu.h
> > index 38daa453f2e5..1fe97d62a286 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/iommu.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/iommu.h
> > @@ -199,6 +199,8 @@ extern int iommu_group_register_notifier(struct 
> > iommu_group *group,
> >  extern int iommu_group_unregister_notifier(struct iommu_group *group,
> >                                        struct notifier_block *nb);
> >  extern int iommu_group_id(struct iommu_group *group);
> > +extern struct iommu_group *iommu_group_get_for_pci_dev(struct pci_dev *dev,
> > +                                                  u16 *alias);
> >  extern struct iommu_group *iommu_group_get_for_dev(struct device *dev);
> >  
> >  extern int iommu_domain_get_attr(struct iommu_domain *domain, enum 
> > iommu_attr,
> 
> 
> 
> 
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

Reply via email to