On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 09:51:51AM -0700, Olav Haugan wrote:
> +int iommu_map_range(struct iommu_domain *domain, unsigned int iova,
> + struct scatterlist *sg, unsigned int len, int prot)
> +{
> + if (unlikely(domain->ops->map_range == NULL))
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + BUG_ON(iova & (~PAGE_MASK));
> +
> + return domain->ops->map_range(domain, iova, sg, len, prot);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iommu_map_range);
> +
> +int iommu_unmap_range(struct iommu_domain *domain, unsigned int iova,
> + unsigned int len)
> +{
> + if (unlikely(domain->ops->unmap_range == NULL))
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + BUG_ON(iova & (~PAGE_MASK));
> +
> + return domain->ops->unmap_range(domain, iova, len);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iommu_unmap_range);
Before introducing these new API functions there should be a fall-back
for IOMMU drivers that do (not yet) implement the map_range and
unmap_range call-backs.
The last thing we want is this kind of functional partitioning between
different IOMMU drivers.
Joerg
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
