On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 01:25:37PM +0800, Mark Zhang wrote:
> On 12/05/2013 08:25 PM, Hiroshi Doyu wrote:
[...]
> > @@ -526,6 +530,21 @@ static int smmu_setup_regs(struct smmu_device *smmu)
> >     return 0;
> >  }
> >  
> > +static void flush_ptc_by_addr(struct smmu_device *smmu, unsigned long *pte,
> > +                         struct page *page)
> > +{
> > +   u32 val;
> > +
> > +   val = VA_PAGE_TO_PA_HI(pte, page);
> > +   if (val)
> > +           smmu_write(smmu, val, SMMU_PTC_FLUSH_1);
> > +
> 
> This is not correct, according to my tests. We should write
> "SMMU_PTC_FLUSH_1" even when the "val" is zero.
> 
> So I just copied Pavan's original work here, after applied this, the
> SMMU works correctly:
> 
> -       val = VA_PAGE_TO_PA_HI(pte, page);
> -       if (val)
> +       if (!pte) {
> +               smmu_write(smmu, SMMU_PTC_FLUSH_TYPE_ALL, SMMU_PTC_FLUSH);
> +               return;
> +       }
> +
> +       if (of_machine_is_compatible("nvidia,tegra124")) {

This check should be replaced by some flag so we don't have to compare
strings every time the PTC is flushed.

Thierry

Attachment: pgpNuX1xren1Z.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

Reply via email to