Hello,

On Wednesday, March 07, 2012 12:22 AM Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:

> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 04:04:22PM +0100, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> > +static int arm_iommu_mmap_attrs(struct device *dev, struct vm_area_struct 
> > *vma,
> > +               void *cpu_addr, dma_addr_t dma_addr, size_t size,
> > +               struct dma_attrs *attrs)
> > +{
> > +   struct arm_vmregion *c;
> > +
> > +   vma->vm_page_prot = __get_dma_pgprot(attrs, vma->vm_page_prot);
> > +   c = arm_vmregion_find(&consistent_head, (unsigned long)cpu_addr);
> 
> What protects this against other insertions/removals from the list?

arm_vmregion_* functions have their own spinlock.

(snipped)

> > +   if (c) {
> > +           struct page **pages = c->priv;
> > +           __dma_free_remap(cpu_addr, size);
> > +           __iommu_remove_mapping(dev, handle, size);
> > +           __iommu_free_buffer(dev, pages, size);
> > +   }
> > +}
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Map a part of the scatter-gather list into contiguous io address space
> > + */
> > +static int __map_sg_chunk(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist *sg,
> > +                     size_t size, dma_addr_t *handle,
> > +                     enum dma_data_direction dir)
> > +{
> > +   struct dma_iommu_mapping *mapping = dev->archdata.mapping;
> > +   dma_addr_t iova, iova_base;
> > +   int ret = 0;
> > +   unsigned int count;
> > +   struct scatterlist *s;
> > +
> > +   size = PAGE_ALIGN(size);
> > +   *handle = ARM_DMA_ERROR;
> > +
> > +   iova_base = iova = __alloc_iova(mapping, size);
> > +   if (iova == ARM_DMA_ERROR)
> > +           return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > +   for (count = 0, s = sg; count < (size >> PAGE_SHIFT); s = sg_next(s))
> > +   {
> > +           phys_addr_t phys = page_to_phys(sg_page(s));
> > +           unsigned int len = PAGE_ALIGN(s->offset + s->length);
> > +
> > +           if (!arch_is_coherent())
> > +                   __dma_page_cpu_to_dev(sg_page(s), s->offset, s->length, 
> > dir);
> > +
> > +           ret = iommu_map(mapping->domain, iova, phys, len, 0);
> 
> Dealing with phys addresses on one part and pages + offset + length
> in a different part doesn't look like a good idea.  Why can't there
> be some consistency?

Well, I have no idea how to be more consistent here. scatter-lists operates on 
pages + offsets + length parameters. iommu api operates on the whole pages, but
they are referred with physical address. Right now I cannot change any of it, 
at least not it the near future.

Best regards
-- 
Marek Szyprowski
Samsung Poland R&D Center


_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

Reply via email to