> On Oct 20, 2019, at 3:01 AM, A.L.E.C <a...@alec.pl> wrote: >>> It might be not useful enough to justify a BC break. > > That was my intention, to find more value in a new feature to justify BC > break.
Your point was well taken, which is why I am now suggesting we consider (one
of) the following instead of `fallthrough`:
break next;
continue next;
-Mike
