Hi internals
This maybe a little bit late but I would like to propose alternative to
this RFC.
What if we add `strict_errors` declare to make every function/method in
files that declared `strict_errors` throw ErrorException on Notice/Warning.
Example:
File: Test.php
<?php
declare(strict_errors=1); // does not support block declare like
'strict_type'
class Test {
public function __construct()
{
echo $a; // ErrorException will be thrown from here
}
}
File: main.php
<?php
require 'Test.php';
$test = new Test(); // Fatal error: Uncaught ErrorException: Undefined
variable: a
But if `set_error_handler()` is in use nothing will happen.
File: main.php
<?php
require 'Test.php';
set_error_handler(function () {
});
$test = new Test(); // silent
I've just made a naive implementation to demonstrate this approach at
https://github.com/webdevxp/php-src.
What I've done was just adding new ZEND_ACC_STRICT_ERRORS flag to top level
function and modified `php_error_cb` to check if there is a caller with
`strict_errors` defined. (by simply checking `EG(current_execute_data)` and
its all `prev_execute_data`)
I think this approach might satify both 'strict camp' and 'bc camp'.
P.S. I myself agree with this RFC and would vote YES if I can vote. And I'm
grateful for Nikita's (and others) contributions that make PHP awesome
today.
Cheers :)
On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 4:33 PM Nikita Popov <nikita....@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi internals,
>
> I think it's time to take a look at our existing warnings & notices in the
> engine, and think about whether their current classification is still
> appropriate. Error conditions like "undefined variable" only generating a
> notice is really quite mind-boggling.
>
> I've prepared an RFC with some suggested classifications, though there's
> room for bikeshedding here...
>
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/engine_warnings
>
> Regards,
> Nikita
>
