> On 13 Sep 2019, at 2:50, Joe Watkins <krak...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Zeev, > > > Without getting to the technicalities, simply put, no. > > I'm not sure what you intend to do to stop it.
I sincerely hope reason will prevail and we won't have to find out (as I was hoping this part of the RFC won't be put up for a vote so that we wouldn't be in this mess to begin with). I am not looking forward to it - but we will not be depreciating fundamental language functionality regardless of the results of this or any other RFC - as RFCs have no mandate to do that. That is a statement of fact. Cheers, Zeev
