On Wed, July 3, 2019 at 10:59 AM Nikita Popov <nikita....@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 4:41 PM Levi Morrison <le...@php.net> wrote: > > > Was any analysis of usage done for top open source projects? I support > > this direction, but would prefer to know its current impact before > > voting. > > > I checked top 2k projects with a 2-3 months outdated data set. Here is the > analysis log: > https://gist.github.com/nikic/b5f811e0423bf051f4492cd6e0c0273e > > Overall there were ~2.2k individual uses of alternative array syntax. To > put that into context, there 888.3k total array accesses in the data set, > which puts usage at about 0.25%. Uses are usually clustered, i.e. if > alternative array syntax is used in a file, it will be used many times. I did some additional analysis on the output of Nikita's script. The number of curly brace usages is inflated somewhat due to duplicate packages. For example, tecnick.com/tcpdf and tecnickcom/tcpdf both have 74 usages, and are the same project which was renamed. Likewise, johnpbloch/wordpress-core and roots/wordpress each have 182 usages, and they are both mirrors of the WordPress core codebase. Another example is magento/zendframework1 which was forked from zendframework/zendframework1 (almost half the curly brace usages have been removed in the magento fork). 53 out of 89 total packages using the curly brace syntax use it 4 or fewer times. 92% of the usages in are in just 25 unique projects. You can view my script and its output here: https://gist.github.com/theodorejb/ba35fc8f72df8823e07c5f3b51870e00 Best regards, Theodore -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
