On Fri, 10 May 2019 22:55:51 +0200 / Niklas Keller <m...@kelunik.com>
said :

> That's exactly the reason why I'm for removing it. There will always
> be ways to circumvent open_basedir and setups like this are insecure.
> It gives a false sense of security. It's not better than nothing,
> because most hosting providers would opt for a real solution instead
> of leaving users entirely unprotected.

What's your solution then? I'll be more than happy to have anything
better that will work with thousands of users :)

Also I don't get the argument that because it isn't perfect it would
not be useful. It definitely is, as a security measure.

chroot isn't perfect either, but you might want to use it as well.

Same for disable_functions, sure there will be ways to go around it,
but it will still block 90% of attacks we might get. So, definitely not
the most reliable thing, but it adds a layer that may help.

I can pick the lock on my front door in about 10 minutes, a
professional probably much less. And you can enter by breaking a window.
But it is still effective as a security measure. And it would be silly
if someone would come and tell me that the lock should be removed
because it gives a false sense of security :)

-- 
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to