> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marco Pivetta [mailto:ocram...@gmail.com]
>
> Also a good chance to finally take a look at code that has been rotting in a 
> hard
> drive for too much time.

It's an odd way of justifying a BC break by saying "you can write this 
one-liner sed or use this third-party tool to alter you code" exactly the same 
way every backwards incompatible change can be fixed then .. and then it makes 
no sense to even discuss.

At the beginning of the proposal it was asked (on mailinglist) if the change 
has any impact on performance (php runs faster/language parses becomes 
substantially simple etc), if there are any security issues (like with magic 
quotes) or maybe similarly as with different extensions there is no one to 
support the code anymore.

But in the end there is only the '<?xml' argument and that the documentation 
discourages short tags because that’s ini specific (while there are bunch of 
other ini directives which change the the way php works (like for example 
precision)) .. and that's it.

So instead of by default disabling it and allowing the users make an conscious 
choice to reenable the option if needed it's removed altogether.



Also  imo the reason why people write now (and not in the discussion phase) 
because for some time in the voting there wasn't the 2/3 majority for the 7.4 
(so no sense to clutter the list) and now in the end only 1-2 votes make the 
difference.

rr




--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to