Thanks to Anatol, who started working on Windows build and "enforced" me 
to implement MSVC support :)

On 2/22/19 3:21 PM, Joe Watkins wrote:
> Thanks for all the effort Dmitry, it's looking in much better shape.
> 
> Cheers
> Joe
> 
> On Fri, 22 Feb 2019 at 13:18, Dmitry Stogov <dmi...@zend.com 
> <mailto:dmi...@zend.com>> wrote:
> 
>     Hi Internals,
> 
> 
>     The RFC and implementation was updated once again.
> 
> 
>     https://wiki.php.net/rfc/jit
> 
> 
>     Now JIT supports PHP builds with compilers without GCC explicit
>     global register variables extension.
> 
>     This means we support CLANG/LLVM (Tested on Linux. Should work on
>     Mac as well) and MSVC.
> 
>     Complete Windows support is not implemented yet, but I don't see any
>     big problems anymore.
> 
> 
>     ZTS support might be implemented after implementation of proposed
>     TSRM API improvement.
> 
> 
>     Thanks. Dmitry.
> 
> 
>     ________________________________
>     From: Dmitry Stogov <dmi...@zend.com <mailto:dmi...@zend.com>>
>     Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2019 16:07
>     To: PHP internals
>     Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] JIT
> 
>     Hi Internals,
> 
>     According to comments, code reviews and discussions, JIT RFC was
>     extended with few new sections.
> 
>     Please, consider to review the RFC once again.
> 
>     https://wiki.php.net/rfc/jit
> 
>     Any suggestion for RFC improvement are welcome.
> 
>     I'm not going to invest significant time into JIT implementation
>     improvement itself, at this point. So, ideas are also welcome, but don't
>     expect to get them implemented tomorrow.
> 
>     Thanks. Dmitry.
> 
>     On 1/31/19 12:43 PM, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
>      > Hi Internals,
>      >
>      >
>      > I'm glad to finally propose including JIT into PHP.
>      >
>      >
>      > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/jit
>      >
>      >
>      > In the current state it may be included both into PHP-8, where we are
>      > going to continue active improvement, and into PHP-7.4, as an
>      > experimental feature.
>      >
>      >
>      > Thanks. Dmitry.
>      >
> 

Reply via email to