> Le 28 janv. 2019 à 08:58, Marco Pivetta <ocram...@gmail.com> a écrit : > >> >> Here, both aspects are not desired: we don't want ppl to type-hint for >> e.g. Serializable - and too bad it exists because I've already seen ppl >> think: "hey, I'll type-hint or extend it to express I want a serializable >> thing". > > > That's actually a very correct thing to do: by declaring that something is > `Serializable`, you are expressing your intent to anybody inspecting the > structure of the object. >
This interface (as well as `JsonSerializable`) is incorrectly named. If I believe the manual, it is an ”interface for customized serializing”; therefore it should have been called `CustomizedSerialization` or something like that. If we use a new interface, at the very least, let its name match its function (or its function match its name). —Claude
