On 20.09.2018 at 12:18,Andrey Andreev wrote: > On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 12:12 PM, Christoph M. Becker <cmbecke...@gmx.de> > wrote: > >> On 20.09.2018 at 08:15, Nicolas Grekas wrote: >> >>> yesterday I submitted https://bugs.php.net/76906 to report that I wasn't >>> able to set the "samesite" attribute on cookies while I followed what's >>> been approved in https://wiki.php.net/rfc/same-site-cookie >>> >>> Damian answered on the bug report that the $options argument has swallowed >>> the lifetime one, so that $options is now the 3rd arg and not the 4th as >>> noted in the RFC. >>> >>> He suggested me to raise the topic on internals, so here we are. >>> >>> Are we fine with this? If yes, shouldn't an errata be added to the RFC so >>> that ppl aren't confused like I was? >> >> Related discussion: <https://externals.io/message/100304#102909>ff. >> >> Not sure if an errata (or amendment) should be added to the RFC, or >> whether it is sufficient to document the new signatures in the manual >> proper and the migration guide. > > Since a PR with that change has been merged, apparently a side was > chosen and so be it, I guess. But given all of the above, I think > adding an errata to the RFC is the least that should be done.
The SameSite cookie attribute support has been documented[1], and an errata section has been added to the RFC[2]. [1] <http://svn.php.net/viewvc?view=revision&revision=345661> [2] <https://wiki.php.net/rfc/same-site-cookie?do=diff&rev2%5B0%5D=1537441490&rev2%5B1%5D=1537441776&difftype=inline> -- Christoph M. Becker -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
