On 07/13/2018 01:27 PM, Sara Golemon wrote:
On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 3:08 PM, Anatol Belski <a...@php.net> wrote:
*snip*
Well, whichever version we've settled on, I've updated
sgolemon/php-release to allow using arbitrary versions of re2c.
https://github.com/sgolemon/php-release/commit/9197257bc6f2f607476f950733a0c13ab5e3e867
If RE2C_VERSION is set to 1.0.3, it'll swap in the pre-built 1.0.3
binary I've included in the package.
Otherwise, it'll clone the source repo, checkout the requested tag (or
commit hash) and build that).
I'll plan on doing 7.2.9+ with 1.0.3 (unless we decide differently by then).
Remi should stick to 0.13.5 (default) for 7.2.8-final as previously stated.
Doing a dry-run now to see how it looks.
-Sara
I build 7.1.x packages for CentOS 7 linked against LibreSSL (I don't do
7.2 because I do every other major release)
I use re2c 0.14.3 because, well, that's what EPEL for CentOS 7 ships.
Is there a real world benefit to upgrading that to the 1.0.3 version in
my build system? (I suspect relatively easy to do)
Is it likely 7.3 will require newer re2c? My LibreSSL PHP packaging is
likely switches to 7.3.x branch when 7.3.2 is released.
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
