On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 1:43 PM Sara Golemon <poll...@php.net> wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 9:26 AM, Dustin Wheeler <mdwhe...@ncsu.edu> wrote: > > That said, if feature freeze for a release is announced well in > > advance, published, > > > Depends on what you consider a proper announcement[1], but it is > published[2] and the date can reliably be expected to occur around > mid-July until and unless we change the GA date (FF is 18 weeks and 2 > days prior to GA, GA in turn is approximately 4 weeks before > Christmas). I'll admit that the publishing of the 7.3 timeline came > very late this year and that's on myself and Remi. The RM selection > process should have started two months earlier than it did. >
Yeah, I worded that pretty terribly. I should have put a parenthetical after that if statement. Agree 100% on adequate annoucement. > > and there was an agreed "best intentions" policy > > to not submit RFCs that encroach on that date, > > > I had hoped there already was an agreement on this. Seeing the SIX > currently in voting makes me doubt that understanding is shared (okay, > in fairness, Class Friendship isn't targeting 7.3). > Class Friendship is currently targeting the trash! :P > > That, or subconsciously, the talk of a new version of > > PHP sparked folks to get off their ass and put forth their ideas! :P > > > That's very likely a contributing factor, especially with talk of 7.4 > being deprecations focused (something I'm finding myself agreeing with > less and less over time). This isn't new to this year though, even if > it's been less pronounced till now. > I'm relatively new to all of this. I think it's a bit strange to earmark a minor release as deprecation-only, but I also wasn't around for the last major upgrade to see discussion (was 5.6 the focus of many deprecations?) It can be frustrating, but I really like to see humans conversing and finding flexible solutions for the greater good (which is already happening here). Perhaps there is a reasonable way to document / communicate the shared understanding that "sending new RFCs to a release that's so close to feature freeze that it's questionable whether voting will end in time" is bad form. Having a parenthetical that covers "exceptional work" could also address situations like the property types RFC, which ... not to minimize ANY other work on-going ... is in my opinion, worthy of such an exception. Where would be a good place to document that? https://wiki.php.net/rfc/howto? -- Dustin Wheeler | Software Developer NC State University mdwhe...@ncsu.edu "If you don't know where you're going, it's easy to iteratively not get there." -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
