Replying to Joe's email because I didn't get the original. On Sun, Jun 10, 2018 at 1:09 PM Joe Watkins <pthre...@pthreads.org> wrote: > > This is not ready for voting, please stop the vote. > > Bringing stuff to vote that is incomplete, where there is no clear > consensus, is dangerous. > > > On Sun, Jun 10, 2018 at 2:09 PM, Haitao Lv <i...@lvht.net> wrote: > > > Hello Internals, > > > > The RFC for fiber is now open for a vote. The RFC is available at > > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/fiber. > > > > Voting will be open until June 22th, 2018. > > > > Thank you.
I don't think I've listed my complaints yet although I believe others already covered these: 1. I don't like `Fiber::` referring to the fiber running. I would prefer it being passed as a parameter. 2. As written and implemented this is not sufficiently different from generators. If fibers supported suspending/resuming C code as well then it may be powerful enough to justify it, however... 3. I don't feel this low-level building block is proven. Theoretically we should be able to build async/await functionality with it, which is I believe is the real goal. However, until I've seen it built, demonstrated, and critiqued I don't think we can claim the the low-level building block is sound. Sorry for not providing feedback sooner. Levi Morrison -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
