On 05/11/2018 03:50 AM, Arvids Godjuks wrote:
2018-05-11 12:36 GMT+02:00 Alice Wonder <al...@librelamp.com>:
On 05/11/2018 01:59 AM, Arvids Godjuks wrote:
2018-05-10 16:33 GMT+02:00 Niklas Keller <m...@kelunik.com>:
Hey,
I hereby propose to deprecate uniqid(). There have been attempts to fix
it
(
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/uniqid), but those were rejected during
discussion, because there's no possible fix without breaking BC. Instead
of
a subtle BC break, this RFC favors the deprecation and moving users to
other functions.
It's to be discussed whether the function should be removed with PHP 8.0
or
just deprecated to avoid fully breaking things where it's not strictly
necessary. A deprecation will probably avoid most new usages, which is
the
main goal.
RFC: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/deprecate-uniqid
Kind Regards,
Niklas
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Hello,
as a userland user of this function I do disagree with it's outright
removal. It has it's uses.
What can be done with it is drop the $more_entropy flag and make it
generate at least as long strings and use random_bytes under the hood for
a
better random.
It can also adopt a length parameter so you can vary the random part as
much as you need it.
You don't always need a truly random token - I have a system that uses
uniqid to generate tens of thousands tokens per request and it's actually
a
good thing they are time based at the start of it with a random part at
the
end (as I said the random part should be improved and get rid of that
stupid dot when generating with $more_entropy = true).
It seems to me that for your use case, you could just use the time()
function to get part of your unique id and then use libsodium to generated
a nonce for the "random" part, using sodium's function for increment the
nonce between each use.
Predictable, sure, but your use case says they don't need to be a truly
random token - just unique (essentially a non-random nonce) but with a time
component.
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Hello Alice,
Sure, there is lots I can do about that project, including what you have
described. One thing though - client does not need it or want it or want's
to pay for that work. That whole project is a poster child for a "side
project on a bare minimum, but done by a competent developer instead of a
student so it actually works in the long run"
Tell the client they can use this for free.
function compat_uniqid(string $prefix='', bool $more_entropy = false)
{
static $nonce = null;
if(is_null($nonce)) {
$nonce = random_bytes(SODIUM_CRYPTO_SECRETBOX_NONCEBYTES);
}
$m = microtime(true);
$return = sprintf("%8x%05x",floor($m),($m-floor($m))*1000000);
if($more_entropy) {
sodium_increment($nonce);
$x = hexdec(substr(bin2hex($nonce),0,8));
$x = str_pad($x, 12, "0", STR_PAD_LEFT);
$return = $return . substr($x, 0, 1) . '.' . substr($x, -8);
}
return $prefix . $return;
}
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
