Am 03.01.18 um 10:55 schrieb Sanford Whiteman: > Tony, you have a point in the sense that a proposed Code of Conduct -- > which would have been binding on posts to lists @php.net -- provoked a > fiery debate (to put it mildly) and was eventually withdrawn > (http://news.php.net/php.internals/90726). > > The dominant objections to the CoC did not focus on relatively > apolitical cases like calling someone a habitual liar or implying > non-augmented humans can write bug-free code. Yet the point remains > that there is no doc whose letter or spirit can be debated, AFAIK.
May I point to the headline "Mailing List Posting Guideline" at the Mailing-List page[0]? Especially the references to the README.MAILINGLIST_RULES[1] right at the end? Which in turn references RFC 1855[2]? So I'd say there actually *is* even more than one doc whose letter or spirit can be debated. But debating is one thing, taking action is another one. Just my 0.02€ Cheers Andreas [0] http://php.net/mailing-lists.php [1] http://git.php.net/?p=php-src.git;a=blob_plain;f=README.MAILINGLIST_RULES;hb=HEAD [2] http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1855.html -- ,,, (o o) +---------------------------------------------------------ooO-(_)-Ooo-+ | Andreas Heigl | | mailto:andr...@heigl.org N 50°22'59.5" E 08°23'58" | | http://andreas.heigl.org http://hei.gl/wiFKy7 | +---------------------------------------------------------------------+ | http://hei.gl/root-ca | +---------------------------------------------------------------------+
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
