On 10 December 2017 11:05:23 GMT+00:00, Niklas Keller <m...@kelunik.com> wrote:
>>
>> This.  There's nothing undefinable about "1 instanceof \stdClass",
>the
>> clear and obvious answer is: "No, it's not an instance of \stdClass,
>> it's an integer."  The runtime result of false makes sense, the
>> compile time error doesn't.  Let's relax the compile time error (fold
>> it into a const false if you truly must) and call it done.  There's
>no
>> need to be hostile to users just because the code *seems* silly.
>>
>
>This code doesn't just *seem* silly. For everything but testing whether
>it
>works it is totally useless.

It's useless, but also harmless. Unless anyone can think of a scenario where 
someone would do this by mistake intending to do something else?


>But we might turn the fatal error into a warning like we do it for
>"use" in
>the global namespace: https://3v4l.org/ph7KW

I feel like both that example and the case we're discussing should be a notice 
at most; it's not telling me my code is broken, just that some of it's 
unnecessary. Maybe I've decided it makes my code more self-documenting, and 
don't care that the compiler thinks I'm dumb.

Adding warnings has a "boy who cried wolf" cost: if people get used to ignoring 
ones they disagree with, they'll miss ones that are genuine problems. 

Regards,

-- 
Rowan Collins
[IMSoP]

--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to