On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 2:33 PM, Michael Döhler <michaeldoeh...@me.com> wrote: > I am open for any approach, but maybe we have to differentiate between class > constants and method references? > Given the discussion we had around the namespace separator (and why we DIDN'T go with ::), there may be similar issues here. Maybe not, given the final component is specifically T_METHOD, but it should be prototyped to be sure.
As to what such a reference would evaluate to: Foo::bar::method -> [ Foo::class, 'bar' ] as Michael Döhler suggests seems the obvious answer, but (Foo::class.'::bar') may be what some would expect. Ideally we'd have first-class references to functions. -Sara -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
