Whoops, just noticed I sent this to Zeev directly last night rather than the list.
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Sara Golemon <poll...@php.net> Date: Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 10:28 PM Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC][Discuss] Increase non-syntax runtime-impacting RFC voting threshold to 60% To: Zeev Suraski <z...@zend.com> On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 5:00 PM, Zeev Suraski <z...@zend.com> wrote: > Remarkable timing. In the last few days I’ve been working on a completely > rewritten RFC workflow & voting RFC. It’s a bit premature, but given you > just brought up on of the main points - I want to share it with you. > > Ah! Great minds think alike, and apparently so do we. Looks like you've put quite a lot more thought and time in, and a replacement standard would leave less ambiguity than a mere update, so I'll withdraw the one I put up and wait for you to formally open discussion on yours. > Note - I’m not going to bring it up for discussion in the immediate future > - because I’m going on a 3.5wk vacation starting next week - but if all > goes well I think I’ll bring it up for discussion towards the end of > October. > > Yeaaaahhhh, don't you have a conference coming up as well? > Can you take a look? > > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/voting2017 > > Again, won’t be publishing it in the immediate future so even if you > absolutely hate it, be sure to tell that just to me 🙂 > > I don't see anything here I don't agree with at first blush. And I like the preference towards 2/3 uniformity across implementation changes. I just wasn't keen on trying to win support for such an aggro change. +1 as we used to say. :D -Sara
