Hi, On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 6:35 AM, li...@rhsoft.net <li...@rhsoft.net> wrote:
> > Am 11.09.2017 um 23:07 schrieb Yasuo Ohgaki > >> On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 12:22 AM, Stephen Reay <php-li...@koalephant.com> >> >>> So, you still didn’t actually provide an example. I *guess* you’re >>> talking >>> about character class validation or something else equally “simple”, >>> because I can’t imagine what else would be a common enough case that >>> you’d >>> want to have built-in rules for, and that you wouldn’t internally use >>> RegExp to test anyway. >>> >> >> Your request is like "Devil's Proof". Example code that cannot do things >> with existing API cannot exist with meaningful manner. It can be explained >> why it cannot, though. Try what "validate" string validator can do, >> Then you'll see. >> >> There is no STRING validation filter currently. This fact alone, >> it could be said "filter cannot do string validation currently". >> >> List of problems in current validation filter >> > but you still fail to explain why in the world you don#t try to enhance > the existing filter functions instead invent a new beast leading finally to > have the existin filter functions and your new stuff which share the same > intention > > Why don't you read previous RFC and the vote result? https://wiki.php.net/rfc/add_validate_functions_to_filter Regards, -- Yasuo Ohgaki yohg...@ohgaki.net
