> On Sep 4, 2017, at 18:06, Marco Pivetta <ocram...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 8:56 PM, Crocodile <crocodil...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> In most cases users would like more than just valid/invalid, i. e. which >> particular rule(s) failed and also human-readable error messages. As of >> simple validation that is almost always at hand, filter_* functions do a >> good job, although I agree that they could be better. I, for one, would >> like to see a full-featured validation as part of PHP. However, this RFC >> only looks like a slightly better version of filter_* functions, that is, >> the new module will provide almost the same functionality but with a >> different interface. I would vote against it. >> > > And also, it would need to be better than all of these to be worth writing > it in C: > > https://packagist.org/search/?q=validator
And these as well: https://packagist.org/search/?q=filter (Or at least have some level of parity.) -- Paul M. Jones pmjone...@gmail.com http://paul-m-jones.com Modernizing Legacy Applications in PHP https://leanpub.com/mlaphp Solving the N+1 Problem in PHP https://leanpub.com/sn1php -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
