> On Jul 18, 2017, at 08:37, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> Am 18.07.2017 um 15:23 schrieb Frederik Bosch | Genkgo:
>> Hi Andrey,
>> Thanks for your feedback. If we are going to wait for http_cookie_set, then 
>> my guess will be that it will take a while before we see samesite cookie 
>> implemented. While I totally agree there is need for a new function with a 
>> better API, I fail to see why that would mean we cannot have a samesite 
>> argument in the set(raw)cookie functions now. The RFC is in line with the 
>> design of these functions.
>> With regard to browsers not implementing it, let me quote the currrent 
>> documentation on the httponly argument. "It has been suggested that this 
>> setting can effectively help to reduce identity theft through XSS attacks 
>> (although it is not supported by all browsers), but that claim is often 
>> disputed." Basically it says that it is not supported by all browsers, but 
>> provides help reducing XSS attacks. I don't see the difference with samesite.
> 
> which browser in 2017 does not support 'httponly'?
> that was true a decade ago, now that parapgraph in the docs is just FUD

(/me nods)

Perhaps the same will be true for "samesite".


-- 
Paul M. Jones
pmjone...@gmail.com
http://paul-m-jones.com

Modernizing Legacy Applications in PHP
https://leanpub.com/mlaphp

Solving the N+1 Problem in PHP
https://leanpub.com/sn1php




--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to