On 10.06.2017 at 21:29, Rowan Collins wrote:

> On 8 June 2017 08:52:41 BST, "François Laupretre" <franc...@php.net> wrote:
>> It would be great, IMO, to open a 'Approved for 8.0' section
>> on 
>> the RFC page now, and your RFC could proudly be the 1st one to enter
>> it.
> 
> I definitely agree with this, as I've argued before for a more timeline based 
> approach to major releases to avoid / reduce a repeat of the "quick, while 
> 7.0 is on the table" RFC rush, and the "well, 7.1 is still kinda the 
> beginning of 7.x, so we can break things a little" kludges.

I second that.  Consider, for instance, the "Deprecate and remove
INTL_IDNA_VARIANT_2003" RFC[1].  It has been decided to change the
default of idn_to_*() to INTL_IDNA_VARIANT_UTS46 as of PHP 7.4.  But
what if there will not even be a PHP 7.4?  Also it has been decided to
remove support for INTL_IDNA_VARIANT_2003 as of PHP 8.0.  What if there
will be a PHP 7.42 – would we have to wait for decades to remove
INTL_IDNA_VARIANT_2003 support?

[1] <https://wiki.php.net/rfc/deprecate-and-remove-intl_idna_variant_2003>

-- 
Christoph M. Becker

-- 
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to