On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 10:19 PM, li...@rhsoft.net <li...@rhsoft.net> wrote: > 100% internal codebase without 3rd party libraries developed over the last > 15 years and in the meantime 100% strict-types/typehints/return-types only > missing some commented nullable/void return types because i need to wait > with 7.1.x for another busy guy with some of his instances :-) > Would you mind running some numbers against "commodity apps/frameworks" (e.g. Wordpress, ZendFramework, Laravel, etc...) I expect that will be far more telling (in a potentially positive way). For example, HHVM performs best on "highly optimized code", which is why it tends to look a bit tepid against PHP 7 when run on "normal" codebases (particularly WP, which is in many ways not JIT friendly). I realize the proof of concept jit branch is probably missing quite a bit of optimizations compared to where it will land, so it may not make then same kind of difference, but hey... curiosity killed the cat.
> the profiling system is our internal demo-system with every depolyable > module installed, runs the auto-testsuite inclduing refelection fuzzy-calls > Sounds very comprehensive and I'm glad you're using such a heavy benchmarking suite. :D > so 5% is not that bad > Apologies if I gave the impression that I felt it was "bad". My expressed disappointment was only relative to the headline "ZOMGWTFBBQ 100% GAIN" headline (which I think most of us regarded as probably wrong in some way due to the early-days nature of the jit branch). :) -Sara -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
