On Tue, 28 Mar 2017, Marco Pivetta wrote: > Voted "no" because of this paragraph: > > > This RFC proposes to allow this, even if it has very few uses, and > > because there is no reason to disallow a compatible redefinition. > > I couldn't see a use-case. > > In addition to that, this breaks the assumption that the topmost abstract > signature is the authoritative one. That is a subtle BC break, but still a > BC break. Yes, I know I'm annoying, sorry 😥
As there is a subtle BC break, then that needs to be mentioned in the RFC under "Backward Incompatible Changes". cheers, Derick
-- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
