On 12 December 2016 14:42:11 GMT+00:00, "Silvio Marijić" <marijic.sil...@gmail.com> wrote: >I understand that, but I think we'll have to meet in the middle. How >would >you handle situation where for one little change you have to manually >recreate not so trivial object with a lot of arguments ? I don't think >that >should be a deal breaker for this RFC but I do agree that we should try >to >find solution to bridge that gap and put that aside in a other rfc.
I think there needs to be some "escape hatch" that the author of the class itself can use and control. For instance, a keyword on methods that marks them as a kind of copy constructor, giving them the same abilities as __construct has. Regards, -- Rowan Collins [IMSoP] -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
