Afternoon Rowan, The sum of their parts amounts to a substantial change in the way we conduct development here.
If we are going to make changes, we should not draw out the process, but nor should we have too much haste in making these decisions. Having a one week discussion period is some kind of compromise between a big RFC, and doing one thing at a time. Let us consider each issue on it's own, make good decisions on each issue, with clear majorities. Cheers Joe On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 6:16 PM, Rowan Collins <rowan.coll...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 17/11/2016 18:03, Joe Watkins wrote: > >> Afternoon Chrisoph, >> >> The minimum number of votes is going to be the subject of another RFC, >> let's leave that aside for now. >> > > I'm not sure splitting this into lots of micro-decisions is wise: why not > discuss a general reform of the voting system, and have a single RFC which > can then document the agreed system, and supersede > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/voting? > > This could then include: > > 1) Clarifying who exactly can vote; the current definition is very vague, > and allows for wildly differing numbers of votes, making the next two > points much harder. > 2) Should there be a "quorum" (minimum number of votes) required for a > vote to be passed? > 3) What should be the minimum proportion of votes required for a > resolution to pass, given the decisions made under 1 and 2. > > These issues are all interconnected - if you have a large voter base, and > a large quorum, then the difference between 50% and 66% is much higher. > > Regards, > -- > Rowan Collins > [IMSoP] > > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > >
