> On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 7:49 AM David Walker <d...@mudsite.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > As of now, the scheduled time the vote is to close, the RFC stands 19-4 > (accepted). Given this is my first solo RFC, I'm not really sure protocol > to go from here. Dmitry does raise that the implementation I put forward > maybe a bit hackish compared to what someone much more knowledgeable could > implement. So I'm not certain if the RFC should be deemed accepted, or, > fall into the howto section 7(3) and go back to discussion (if it is > considered a serious issue). > > Direction appreciated.
The idea is approved. It still has to be an accepted PR. So, take the dissenting feedback as a guide to improve the test coverage and implementation. Possibly try the null coalesce approach as an alternative implementation: that might make it all simpler! If you get stuck, bounce the list a question. We're here to help.
