On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 4:13 PM, Levi Morrison <le...@php.net> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 7:56 AM, Alexander Lisachenko > <lisachenko...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> 2016-08-23 16:40 GMT+03:00 Julien Pauli <jpa...@php.net>: >>> >>> My patch allows that, but I can't find a use case to it. >> >> >> >> My use case for that was decorating of static methods with additional >> behaviour, so it's possible to cache the result of static methods, etc. >> Unfortunately, reflection API doesn't provide me such an ability, so I >> decided to switch to the combination of special closure with >> forward_static_call_array() and binding it to the desired scope. >> >> >> 2016-08-23 16:40 GMT+03:00 Julien Pauli <jpa...@php.net>: >>> >>> Try it. >> >> >> Yes, sure, I will check. However as I say earlier, now I use closure >> extraction and scope binding as more natural way to invoke such methods. So >> missing scope argument for static methods and ReflectionMethod->invoke() is >> a nice thing to have, but not a critical one. > > Seems to me you should be calling getClosure() and using > Closure::bindTo before invoking it. ReflectionMethod::invoke is really > just a short-cut for a common case; I don't think it's reasonable to > have it mirror the Closure API just to save one method call to get a > Closure.
This cannot work. There is a special use case forbidding that. "Cannot rebind scope of closure created by ReflectionFunctionAbstract::getClosure()" Julien -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
