On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 10:30 AM, Christoph M. Becker <cmbecke...@gmx.de> wrote: > On 23.08.2016 at 00:25, Levi Morrison wrote: > >> On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 3:40 PM, Rowan Collins <rowan.coll...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> Christoph already linked to this comment in the source >>> [https://github.com/php/php-src/blob/PHP-7.0.10/ext/reflection/php_reflection.c#L3197-L3202]: >>> >>>> /* In case this is a static method, we should'nt pass an object_ptr >>>> * (which is used as calling context aka $this). We can thus ignore the >>>> * first parameter. >>>> * >>>> * Else, we verify that the given object is an instance of the class.. >>>> */ >>> >>> A simple blame takes that comment back effectively unchanged to Nov 2005, >>> when reflection was first moved to "ext/reflection": >>> https://github.com/php/php-src/blob/7cb0480d04933e3d27b75edf29822815a6108894/ext/reflection/php_reflection.c#L2163 >>> >>> Before that, it was in zend_reflection_api.c, and blames back to the rather >>> general "more of Timm's implementation" committed by George Schlossnagle in >>> July 2003: >>> https://github.com/php/php-src/commit/84f5e4870e13f76a6223a0a937809092ae70d543#diff-cf9733a6fe0eeed1f5a44b59667967baR984 >>> >>> The inconsistency then comes in when invokeArgs is added by Marcus Boerger >>> over a year later: >>> https://github.com/php/php-src/commit/41b87ab486c26f9b2d1bc315988b8e8271b6e06b >>> >>> The new methods made use of the (presumably new?) zend_parse_parameters >>> system, and specified the first argument as a mandatory object, which was >>> fixed a few days later to have an optional object, and a separate check >>> when it is required: >>> https://github.com/php/php-src/commit/63b288c4646d405d0edfb7657505b2acf5643514 >>> >>> Notably, the same comment completely ignoring the first parameter was >>> present in that first implementation of invokeArgs. > > Thanks for investigating on the history, Rowan! > >>> So, it's pretty clear to me that there was no intention for the two to be >>> different, just different contributors at different times. It's also pretty >>> clear that the only thought put into the first argument with static methods >>> is "ignore it". > > ACK > >>> None of which really answers what the behaviour should be, in my opinion. >>> We still have to decide 3 things: >>> >>> - Is there a compelling reason to change the current behaviour? >>> - What error or behaviour should a string or other non-object argument give? >>> - What error or behaviour should an object argument give? >>> >>> In my opinion, the best "fix", if something needs to change, would be to >>> reject anything other than null; that anything else works appears to just >>> be an oversight. >> >> Anyone oppose to emitting E_DEPRECATED for a parameter other than an >> object or null? This opens up the possibility to use it for something >> no earlier than 8.0. > > That appears to be the most reasonable compromise presented yet. Thanks > Levi! I suggest to wait for Julian, though, who wrote: "I'll prepare a > patch exposing my ideas soon."
All right. I was thinking something like this : https://github.com/jpauli/php-src/commit/8735d6b72de0edc3b370245737c0f4f204fcbea0 But it makes no sense. It makes no sense to pass a class name as first param of invoke() , to target a specific function. Why not create the ReflectionClass instance using that latter so ? I'm OK to deprecate the first arg as a string, then remove such an usage in next major. I can make such a patch if consensus. Julien -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
