First argument can be a normal string with a valid scope class name for static methods. This can be useful for calling parent static methods, see my example.
I think this will be comparable with Closure::call() method and scope binding. понедельник, 22 августа 2016 г. пользователь Rowan Collins написал: > On 22/08/2016 16:40, Christoph M. Becker wrote: > >> It is still ignored if it is a valid object, so the current beta's >>> > behaviour doesn't actually make a lot of sense. >>> >> Well, see <https://3v4l.org/n8cad>. Only as of 7.1.0beta3 ::invoke() >> matches the behavior of ::invokeArgs(). >> > > OK, so that's a further inconsistency. The current version still doesn't > actually make sense, though. If you want to validate that the correct > argument is being passed, then the only value allowed should be null. > > If so desired, I can revert that commit, but I wouldn't be happy with >> sticking with a completely unused parameter, which obviously has been >> and still is misunderstood. >> > > The parameter is still unused, and can be any object. The only sane > validation would be to check explicitly for null, which is documented as > the correct argument for both invoke() and invokeArgs(). > > Regards, > -- > Rowan Collins > [IMSoP] > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > >
