On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 1:52 PM, Marco Pivetta <ocram...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I still want to see code that outweights these commonly used open-source > tools before you grab that argument again. > > As also said by Dan: new features => adaptation required. > > Supporting `?` in your own home-grown internal code-generator is something > you can do as part of a 7.1 migration path, exactly like we'll have to do > with the OSS libs. > > That said, I'm muting the thread: I'm basically wasting time with this, > apparently. > > > Marco Pivetta > > http://twitter.com/Ocramius > > http://ocramius.github.com/ > > On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 9:48 PM, Levi Morrison <le...@php.net> wrote: > >> The issue here is around changes that affect old features (__toString), >>> where the behavior changes depending on whether a parameter is defaulted or >>> not (also a previously existing feature) >>> >> >> Which has existed for only one release. This is a small BC break and is >> intended. We previously had nullable types just no way to really encode it >> as a type. We now do. Breaking code for one single minor version is >> perfectly acceptable, especially given that there are other codebases that >> will break if we do not include the question mark. >> >> > There is a BC break either way. I do not understand why you cannot seem to fully understand this. If there is a BC break either way why not stick with intended behavior even if it breaks code for a few tools for a single version of PHP?
