On Aug 17, 2016 12:20 PM, "Yasuo Ohgaki" <yohg...@ohgaki.net> wrote: > > Hi Dan, > > I understood about RFC process. > > On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 12:23 PM, Dan Ackroyd <dan...@basereality.com> wrote: > > Additionally, you seem to completely have ignored this: > > > > Dan Ackroyd wrote: > >> And I strongly object to the idea of stopping and starting voting on RFCS. Please leave the vote open and if it fails take some time to think about the feedback. > > > > It would benefit everyone if you stopped responding immediately and > > instead took time to actually think about what people have been > > saying. This RFC isn't going to be in PHP 7.1, so it is fine to wait 3 > > months to present a new version of the RFC. > > It seems I've marked "already read" by mistake. > Thank you for reminding. > I got that you prefer userland implementation. > > I'm planning to propose "Filter module deprecation" when this RFC > is declined, because current validation filter is not good enough to > do the job and makes situation worse than better... If deprecation > RFC is declined also, then I might try to improve this RFC again.
I already can say I will vote no for that one. I use filter a lot and it fits my needs quite well. I would prefer better api like method->get... But what we have already allows me to do quick&eazy filtering.
