On 8/17/16, 3:48 PM, "Charles R. Portwood II"
<charlesportwoo...@ethreal.net on behalf of charlesportwoo...@erianna.com>
wrote:

>Hi everyone,
>
>I've spent the last week and a half playing around with various cost
>factors on different virtual machines and hardware (including compiling
>this down for armv6 and testing on a Pi Zero), and looking over the spec
>a bit more and would like to update the proposal to use the following
>cost factors:
>
>
>memory_cost = 1 MiB
>time_cost = 2
>threads = 2
>
>
>There are no "bad" cost factors for Argon2, but obviously more work is
>better than less. These cost factors provide sufficient work effort
>without exhausting system resources. Argon2 is pretty fast with these
>cost factors even on a Pi Zero, which is the most resource constrained
>system I could get my hands on. In all my testing I wasn't ever able to
>get memory exhaustion to occur just from running argon2 hashing.
>
>I'd like to gather some last feedback and make sure there aren't any
>serious objections to these cost factors (or anything else for that
>matter) before putting this up for a vote. Please let me know your
>thoughts.

Hi Charles,

I trust your judgement in drawing conclusions from these experiments.

Thank you for the work you've put in.

Tom



-- 
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to