@Fleshgrinder, Thanks, every help is welcome. 2016-08-08 18:44 GMT+02:00 Fleshgrinder <p...@fleshgrinder.com>:
> On 8/8/2016 5:00 PM, Silvio Marijić wrote: > > It's great that you are up of this. > > I think it will be great to see this one in action. > > > > I agree that we should separate them into separate RFC-s. > > > > 2016-08-08 15:51 GMT+02:00 Michał Brzuchalski <mic...@brzuchalski.com>: > > > >> It is great to hear somone is interested so why not. My lately > discussion > >> found usefull implementing 3 keywords, such as: > >> 1. *immutable* for the functionality you are currently working on. > >> 2. *sealed* for the above plus type not changeable. > >> 3. *final* for the above plus not being overridable. > >> > >> But all of them should be implemented in different RFC's starting from > >> Immutable because it's base point to toher two keywords. > >> Whole idea needs refreshing discussion to clarify idea so it can > success. > >> > > I would like to offer my support. I might not be as familiar as you guys > with the C source but if you need anything (e.g. documentation, RFC > writing, testing, ...) let me know. > > -- > Richard "Fleshgrinder" Fussenegger > > -- Silvio Marijić Software Engineer 2e Systems
