Hi! > Don't presume that "no updates" does not mean "not in use", or "not > maintained" though.
True. I am not concerned about having many updates though but rather having somebody who would make updates if needed. For those two, we officially don't have anybody. I suspect there is a number of extensions which unofficially are in the same positions, due to nobody listed as maintainers, or people listed as maintainers having moved on since and not really interested in being maintainers, or just us having no idea about whether somebody is maintaining or not. We have 20 extensions listed as "Unknown" and among those listed as maintained, also some that nobody officially listed as maintainer has touched the bugs filed for the extension for many years. This is not to imply somebody's fault or make a judgement on the quality of code or importance of the extensions. It is a natural process that maintainers change. But I think we should realistically evaluate what is really maintained and what is not, identify where we have gaps and either solicit help to close these gaps or admit that we don't have the resource to maintain it right now. -- Stas Malyshev smalys...@gmail.com -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php