On Sat, 9 Jul 2016 at 10:16 Christoph Becker <cmbecke...@gmx.de> wrote:
> > Assuming that "Make array_rand() more efficient" is indeed only about > performance (and not about fixes for the broken implementation), it > wouldn't be a bug fix, but as array_rand()'s behavior would change > anyway as noted by the RFC, it makes sense to do it as well. > > Possibly badly worded by me. It makes the output of array_rand less biased.
