On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 8:48 AM, Christoph Becker <cmbecke...@gmx.de> wrote: > On 06.07.2016 at 11:23, Rowan Collins wrote: > >> On 05/07/2016 22:06, Levi Morrison wrote: >> >>> It would have been great if people actually contributed to the >>> discussion before voting phase, but such is life. >> >> Yes, for my part, I apologise that I didn't pay any attention to this >> RFC previously, and just happened upon this sub-thread. I can understand >> your frustration at this all coming so late. > > I agree that it is unfortunate that some of the discussion only happened > after the RFC has been put to voting. However, there have only been 15 > days between announcing the RFC and starting the vote (plus an > additional 6 days for a pre RFC announcement), and during this time > several other RFCs were also under discussion or in voting phase, what > made it hard to assess all of them in a timely manner.
Just to clarify this: *all* of the discussion happened after the RFC was put into vote, not just some of it. I've talked to a few people off list to see why they voted no. There are several different reasons but nobody bothered to voice any of them until voting. How can we make better RFCs if people don't discuss until its too late? -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
