On 12/05/16 12:39, Michael Wallner wrote:
> On 12/05/16 13:36, Lester Caine wrote:
>> > On 12/05/16 11:21, Davey Shafik wrote:
>>> >> E.g. the behavior of passing executing with a null value for the
>>> >> argument is something you should be consciously making a decision on,
>>> >> and passing in null explicitly.
>> > 
>> > I was actually getting the logic wrong... the problem with this proposal
>> > is that I HAVE to add the '?' for many of my libraries to continue to
>> > work simply because they do handle the null case. So what was a working
>> > system is broken by this change.
>> > 
> So you already have function foo(Foo $foo = null)?
> No need to change anything.

To be honest I don't know ... *I* would not necessarily add '= null'
because that is the default case anyway ... I'm not sure fromthis
'little change' just what the full knock on effect is to code that goes
back 15 years?

-- 
Lester Caine - G8HFL
-----------------------------
Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact
L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk
EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/
Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk
Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk

-- 
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to