On Mon, May 9, 2016, at 10:21 PM, Stanislav Malyshev wrote: > Hi! > > > |> seems like a common symbol to use, but it admittedly does look a > > So, usage in one semi-obscure language (F#) and one completely obscure > one (Elixir) - Clojure doesn't use |> - and one proposal for Javascript > now qualifies for "common". And that counting the fact that neither of > them actually uses the worst part of proposed syntax - magic variable $$. > -- > Stas Malyshev > smalys...@gmail.com
If the issue is $$ feels too Perl like, what is the alternative? Is there another way to chain methods cleanly? In a sense, what we're really talking about here is continuations. Continuations (over-simplified) are a clean way of setting up "run this function, pass its result to this function, pass its result to this function, etc." That makes composition really easy. |> is essentially a continuation syntax. The $$ is to work around the fact that PHP function can have an arbitrary number of parameters, whereas continuations work best with single-parameter functions. Of course, with currying any multi-parameter function can be reduced to a series of single parameter functions. So what if we were to limit the concurrency syntax to single-parameter functions? And if you want to reduce a multi-parameter function to a single parameter function, yay closures. Would that limitation help or hinder? Either way, I firmly believe that more functional-friendly capabilities like continuations, promises, etc. are a direction that PHP needs to move, and syntax in that direction is valuable. -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
