On 30/04/16 20:57, Sara Golemon wrote: > On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 11:41 AM, <les...@lsces.co.uk> wrote: >> God I hate crap software ... TRYING to reply without top post ... but >> Samsung is incapable! >> >> What I was trying to comment on was that trapping that no result is returned >> may be what is needed, so handling the empty array rather than a null return >> just means having to remember what you do use :( >> > What follows is a terrible idea and I don't mean to propose it as a > solution, but to spark further conversation: > > $result = getData() > ?> doStuffWith($$)
I thought this was the "PHP, stop messing around with my HTML" operator? > :> actOnFailureOf($$); > > Basically, a chaining ternary such that the result of the condition > expression propagates to the true/false expressions. Not really the > same feature at this point, but a similar chaining-friendly take on > the standard ternary. Just thinking out loud... -- Regards, Mike
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
