Hi,
I changed the name but I really don’ know how to change the url :)
Midori
> On 24 Mar 2016, at 21:35, Andrea Faulds <a...@ajf.me> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Sara Golemon wrote:
>> Changing "equal" to "assignment" seems to have been the suggestion.
>> I've taken that into the short-ternary version. And as a minor edit
>> (not worth closing/reopening vote) would recommend the same for null
>> coallesce.
>>
>> -Sara
>
> The other suggestion was to change "coalesce" to "coalescing", because the
> former is a grammatical error I made when I wrote the original ?? RFC,
> whereas the latter is the correct name.
>
> Actually, if we go back to my original email on this subject:
>
>>>> Den 2016-03-13 kl. 02:59, skrev Andrea Faulds:
>>>>> I do have one thing to add, though. It's something of a nitpick, but the
>>>>> name ought to be the "null-coalescing assignment operator". This would
>>>>> follow the convention of referring to +=, -= etc. as compound/combined
>>>>> assignment operators[1][2], not "equal" operators (which sounds more like
>>>>> what == and === do, to me) and avoids the mistake ("coalesce" instead of
>>>>> "coalescing") that I originally made in my RFC for ??.[3] I think that
>>>>> RFC naming is important, because the name the author chooses for a
>>>>> feature tends to be the one that ends up in the manual.
>
> I already gave a suggestion for a name there: "null-coalescing assignment
> operator".
>
> It's not a big deal, though. :)
>
> --
> Andrea Faulds
> https://ajf.me/
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
