On 3/15/2016 6:40 PM, Scott Arciszewski wrote: > Link to RFC: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/libsodium > > I'd like to bump the RFC to make Libsodium a core extension, as per > Ferenc's suggestion on the mcrypt RFC. > > Question: If this extension is adopted, which syntax would you prefer? > > \Sodium\func() > Sodium::func() > sodium_func() > > As it currently stands, the PHP extension in PECL uses a namespace + > function format. > > Scott Arciszewski > Chief Development Officer > Paragon Initiative Enterprises <https://paragonie.com> >
The third option (*sodium_func()*) as per coding standard: https://github.com/php/php-src/blob/master/CODING_STANDARDS#L110-L125 I do not think that it makes sense to provide a static class for this functionality, correct me if I am wrong. It definitely makes no sense to namespace the stuff if you want it in core and it violate the coding standards (for a good reason). -- Richard "Fleshgrinder" Fussenegger
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
