Hi! > Now, if we are still adamant on coming up with a CoC first I would like > to put forward the following 3 documents as alternatives for the > Contributor Covenant: > > > [A contribution policy for open source that > works](https://medium.com/@jmaynard/a-contribution-policy-for-open-source-that-works-bfc4600c9d83#.d53666v7u)
This one deals with code contributions, but our discussion is wider. In fact, we never, as far as I could remember, had code contribution which was per se controversial. We did have ones that were controversial in that we disagreed on whether or not that code is doing what we actually want to do, but the code usually is not a problem. > > [The Code of > Merit](https://github.com/rosarior/Code-of-Merit/blob/master/CODE_OF_MERIT.md) I don't particularly like this approach, it sounds too defensive. > [The Pragmatists Code of > Conduct](https://github.com/amacgregor/Pragmatists-Code-of-Conduct/blob/master/Prag-Code-of-Conduct.md) This one basically can be TLDRed as "behave as an adult". Which is nice if we were to agree what it means, but that is in no way automatic, thus I am afraid it is not enough :) Assuming good faith is a nice touch though, I like it. -- Stas Malyshev smalys...@gmail.com -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
