On Jan 8, 2016 3:14 AM, "Chase Peeler" <chasepee...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> And none of those caveats exist in the definition you provided.

Hmmm. Which one did you read?

"the act of systematic and/or continued unwanted and annoying actions of
one party or a group, including threats and demands. The purposes may vary,
including racial prejudice, personal malice, an attempt to force someone
to ..."

If I asked him to stop and he continues, aggressively, then it matches the
"unwanted", "annoying" and "to force".

> That is a prime example of one of the main concerns we all have - the
ability for anyone to reshape definitions as they please. Even if you
assume they will do so in a way they believe is in everyone's best
interest, we all know that won't always happen
>
> --
> Chase Peeler
> chasepee...@gmail.com

Reply via email to