On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Pierre Joye <pierre....@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 10:47 AM, Paul M. Jones <pmjone...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Jan 4, 2016, at 21:22, Bishop Bettini <bis...@php.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> Every long standing collaborative system adopts, uses, and sheds rules of 
>>> conduct to suit its real and perceived challenges.
>>
>> Including the one headed by Linus Torvalds, right? (/me rolls eyes)
>>
>> I don't know which is worse: that this is being discussed in the first 
>> place, or that there are so many willing volunteer speech police around to 
>> support it.
>
> What is worst is seeing someone using an example of a person referring
> to abortions, sexual comments related to "stop the breed" and other
> disgusting things as an example of why we should not have a CoC. That
> and the fascist comparison makes me wonder a lot about his values. May
> I suggest you to bring constructive arguments into the game instead? I
> got what you consider as a limitation of free speech. I think many
> already explained why it is not about free speech but protection and
> about confirm and ensure a safe context, given you understand what
> "safe" means here. Hopefully.

And let me be crystal clear here about my view before I stand back
until the RFC is getting more complete.

For one, as much as I dislike bad behaviors, I do not mind it when I
am the target. I was myself quite pushy from time to time while trying
to stay polite (and failed on IRC from time to time). Our RFCs process
improve things a lot by reducing the heat of sterile and frustrating
discussions on internals.

I did not mind either someone telling me I am stupid (for the nicer
version of some of the descriptions I was honored to get) for doing
this or that while providing a patch.

But the thing is not that simple. I am not alone. What you define in a
very disrespectful way as "poor little hurt" is matter of mutual
respects. I known environments where you can be fired to act like
this, even during internal meetings. And this is totally fine. The
base of mutual respect is to create a common base, a compromise where
everyone will feel comfortable within decent limits. Common sense
applies and is highly required in a multi cultural (and without much
direct contacts but email) like the php.net project. This is why
having a CoC, while having little of this kind of problems lately, is
a very good thing as a message. A message telling anyone new that it
is a friendly environment and that this person won't be left alone if
something bad happens.


Cheers,
-- 
Pierre

@pierrejoye | http://www.libgd.org

-- 
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to