On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 12:55 AM, Stanislav Malyshev <smalys...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi! > > > Why not use RC2 as a chance for some security patches to get tested ? > > If we have a RC2 (which is not bad IMO, we have a time slice here at > > end of 2015 that enables us to release an RC2) , we then could merge > > into this one some well-selected security patches, f.e, some that are > > *low* classified , aka that can't get trigerred remotely by user > > payload. > > Generally, if we publish security patch we should release ASAP, as > having public unpatched security issue is bad. Fortunately, the issue > disclosed is not that bad, I'd even doubt it is security issue per se, > as I see no real way to trigger it without code access (it may be I miss > something though). > > Accelerating the schedule is OK with me (as is keeping the current one, > too) but please do not forget to merge pending patches (or please tell > me when you want me to merge them). > > Thanks, > -- > Stas Malyshev > smalys...@gmail.com > so Anatol already tagged 7.0.1, I'm waiting with the 5.6.17 tag for Julien to tag 5.5.31. Julien what is the status there?
